JUST VERIFY THINK TANK

Convening the people advancing practical AI verification.

The Just Verify Think Tank is a standing platform for focused inquiry into AI trust, verification, governance, sovereignty, organisational control and responsible reliance. It brings together perspectives across industries, disciplines and jurisdictions to examine what the evidence supports, where questions remain unresolved and what practical work may follow. Participation is curated around the question, not simply job title, organisation or status.

Architectural verification forum with a central roundtable and connected perspectives converging on independent AI verification
SCOPEIndependent inquiry
FORMATSRoundtables · Research · Programmes
PARTICIPATIONCurated for the question
DIRECTIONFrom evidence to action

WHY THE THINK TANK EXISTS

No single discipline, industry or jurisdiction holds every perspective required to verify AI well.

AI systems increasingly operate across interconnected models, agents, providers, infrastructure, workflows and wider ecosystems. Their questions are not only technical: they involve evidence, governance, organisational risk, law, assurance, procurement, policy, security, human experience and practical adoption.

Different industries and jurisdictions encounter different evidence requirements, operating conditions and dependencies. The Think Tank creates a structured environment in which these perspectives can meet, challenge assumptions and examine what responsible AI adoption and reliance should require in practice.

It connects practical experience with independent inquiry while preserving Just Verify's own judgement. Verification can examine existing evidence and establish additional verifiable evidence; trust remains conditional and open to re-evaluation.

A STANDING PLATFORM FOR INQUIRY

A standing platform for inquiry.

The Roundtable Series is one programme within a wider Think Tank. Questions can emerge through several routes, addressing shared cross-industry concerns and important differences between contexts.

01

AI Verification Initiative

Priorities and questions advancing the wider practice of independent AI verification.

02

Independent Just Verify Inquiry

Emerging issues that warrant focused examination or further investigation.

03

Industry & Jurisdiction Needs

Questions shaped by operating environments, sectors, markets, infrastructure dependencies or regulatory contexts.

04

Collaborative Programmes

Relevant inquiry developed with appropriate organisations, hosts, sponsors or collaborators while Just Verify retains editorial and intellectual independence.

  1. INPUTQuestions and evidence needs
  2. JUST VERIFY THINK TANKIndependent inquiry
  3. ACTIVITYRoundtables, research and programmes
  4. OUTPUTFindings, priorities and continued action

CURRENT THINK TANK PROGRAMME

2026 Just Verify Think Tank Roundtable Series

Cambridge · Oxford · London4–6 November 2026

The current flagship programme within the wider Just Verify Think Tank examines three connected questions in every city.

  • Trust
  • Verification
  • Sovereignty & Independence
Trust
When is an AI system sufficiently trustworthy to rely on?
Verification
How can organisations independently test whether AI behaves as claimed?
Sovereignty & Independence
How can organisations preserve meaningful control as external reliance grows?
01King's College and historic university buildings in Cambridge

CAMBRIDGE

Wednesday

02Historic University of Oxford college buildings

OXFORD

Thursday

03Palace of Westminster and Elizabeth Tower in London

LONDON

Friday

AREAS OF INQUIRY

Current questions shaping independent AI verification.

Current areas include, but are not limited to, the questions below. These are not permanent boundaries: new questions can emerge as AI systems, industries, jurisdictions and evidence requirements evolve.

  1. 01

    AI Verification

    What evidence should organisations require before relying on AI?

  2. 02

    Agentic AI

    How should identity, authority, permissions, delegation and behaviour be understood and independently verified?

  3. 03

    Evidence & Accountability

    How can claims, evidence, decisions and responsibility remain traceable?

  4. 04

    Reliability, Risk & Assurance

    How should performance, failure, uncertainty and changing operating conditions be examined?

  5. 05

    Sovereignty & Infrastructure

    How can organisations understand and retain meaningful control over external dependencies?

  6. 06

    Responsible Adoption & Reliance

    What should organisations understand before they adopt, rely on, scale or delegate meaningful activity to AI?

HOW THE THINK TANK WORKS

From question to continued inquiry.

Frame → Convene → Examine → Continue.The format adapts to the question and the perspectives needed to examine it.

  1. 01 / FRAME

    Define the question

    Clarify the question, organisational decision or evidence gap requiring examination.

  2. 02 / CONVENE

    Bring together relevant perspectives

    Bring together perspectives relevant to that question.

  3. 03 / EXAMINE

    Test evidence and assumptions

    Compare evidence, experience and assumptions while identifying disagreement and uncertainty.

  4. 04 / CONTINUE

    Translate inquiry into direction

    Translate inquiry into findings, further research, Trust Lab activity, practical verification work or additional programmes where justified.

WHO CONTRIBUTES

Cross-industry. Cross-disciplinary. Cross-jurisdictional.

Participation is based on the relevance of the perspective somebody can contribute. Contributors do not need to be recognised AI experts: useful judgement may come from operational experience, sector knowledge, organisational responsibility, research, policy, infrastructure or lived experience of AI.

01

Organisations & Enterprise

Leadership, operations, procurement, strategy, risk, governance and practical AI adoption.

02

AI, Technology & Infrastructure

Models, systems, agents, data, cloud, compute, security, product and emerging technology.

03

Law, Finance & Professional Services

Legal, investment, assurance, advisory, commercial and professional judgement.

THE SHARED TABLERelevant judgement and diversity of perspective

The Think Tank should seek relevant judgement and diversity of perspective rather than one narrow definition of expertise.

04

Government, Policy & Public Sector

Public responsibility, policy, governance and institutional oversight.

05

Research, Standards & Assurance

Academic research, evaluation, testing, certification, standards and evidence perspectives.

06

Civil Society & Wider Stakeholders

Human, societal, public-interest and practical perspectives that reveal assumptions or consequences less visible elsewhere.

WHAT COMES FROM THE WORK

Discussion should lead to something useful.

Think Tank activity may identify evidence gaps, capture disagreement responsibly, establish working priorities, inform continued inquiry and translate insight into action. Outputs should always reflect the evidence and limitations of the inquiry.

  1. 01

    Surface gaps and capture disagreement

    Identify where claims, assumptions or decisions lack sufficient evidence, and record different perspectives without manufacturing artificial consensus.

  2. 02

    Establish working priorities

    Identify where further research, testing, verification or organisational work may be needed.

  3. 03

    Inform continued inquiry

    Develop further roundtables, research, Trust Lab activity or sector and jurisdiction programmes.

  4. 04

    Translate insight into action

    Where appropriate, findings may inform practical organisational decisions, verification requirements or collaborative work.

PRIVACY, ATTRIBUTION & INDEPENDENCE

Designed for open discussion and independent judgement.

Sponsors, hosts, partners and participants do not control Just Verify's conclusions. Think Tank discussion does not constitute certification, legal advice or a decision about what an organisation should trust.

01

Private where required

Sessions may be private or invitation-only to support candid, focused discussion.

02

Responsible attribution

General themes may be shared, but individual comments are not attributed without permission.

03

Independent judgement

Participation or support does not create endorsement, certification or control over Just Verify’s conclusions.

WAYS TO ENGAGE

Choose the route that reflects how you want to take part.

Every request is considered against the relevance of the proposed contribution, the needs of current programmes and the independence of the Think Tank.

01 / PARTICIPATE

Bring your perspective

Bring experience, evidence, questions or perspective into a relevant Think Tank activity.

02 / SPONSOR OR SUPPORT

Support a programme

Support an appropriate series or programme while Just Verify retains control of the agenda, participation and outputs.

03 / COLLABORATE

Develop relevant work together

Explore a bespoke or connected inquiry around an important verification question, industry need or jurisdictional challenge.

START A CONVERSATION

Tell us how you would like to engage.

Share a concise overview and the Just Verify team will consider the most appropriate route.

01 / YOUR DETAILS

Your request will be sent securely to Just Verify for review.

ADVANCE THE NEXT INQUIRY

Bring the question, perspective or support that moves verification forward.

The Think Tank provides a route from serious discussion into continued research, verification work and practical action where justified.